Sarvatobhadra Temple Architecture:

    The Indigenous Foundation of Humayun's Tomb and the Taj Mahal

    The Sarvatobhadra temple represents one of the most sophisticated planning systems in ancient Hindu architecture, and its principles became the fundamental blueprint for major monuments built during the Mughal period in India, particularly Humayun's Tomb and the Taj Mahal. This architectural connection reveals the deep indigenous roots underlying structures commonly attributed solely to Islamic architectural traditions

    Sarvatobhadra temple architectural plan showing square platform with central sanctum and four-way accessibility

     

    The Sarvatobhadra Temple System

    The Sarvatobhadra temple, described in detail in the Vishnudharmottara Purana (an ancient Hindu text on architecture), belonged to the eighth classification of Hindu sacred structures. The name derives from sarvata (from every side) and bhadra (auspicious), indicating a temple characterized by auspiciousness and accessibility from all directions.​​

    Key Architectural Features

    The Sarvatobhadra temple exhibits distinctive elements that make it unique among Hindu architectural forms:

    1. Elevated Square Platform (Jagati)
    The temple rests on a broad, square terrace called jagati—a raised platform that serves multiple purposes including circumambulation (pradakshina) and establishing sacred space. This elevation creates both practical and symbolic separation from the mundane world.​

    2. Central Sanctum (Garbha-griha)
    At the heart of the plan sits the square garbha-griha (literally "womb-house"), the innermost sanctum housing the primary deity. This represents the cosmic center, the axis mundi connecting heaven and earth.​

    3. Four Mandapas in Cardinal Directions
    Surrounding the central sanctum are four mandapas (pavilions or halls) extending in the four cardinal directions—north, south, east, and west. This creates a cruciform or cross-shaped plan radiating from the center.​

    4. Four Corner Chambers (Prasadas)
    Between the four mandapas, in the diagonal corners, sit four smaller chambers or subsidiary shrines (prasadas). This arrangement creates what R. Nath describes as an "octagonalized-square plan" when the corners are chamfered.​​

    5. Four-Way Accessibility
    The Sarvatobhadra features entrances at all four cardinal points, allowing approach from any direction. Staircases on each of the four sides of the platform provide access.​

    6. Enclosing Rampart (Prakara)
    A surrounding wall or prakara defines the sacred precinct, with subsidiary shrines (devakadis) positioned at the corners of the terrace.​​

    7. Sacred Water Features
    Integrated into the design are beautiful tanks and water channels arranged around the central shrine on the terrace, serving both ritual and aesthetic purposes.​​

    8. Panch-Ratna Symbolism
    The temple embodied the panch-ratna (five-jewel) formula: one central shikhara (tower) over the garbha-griha and four subsidiary shikharas over the four mandapas, creating a cluster of five towers with the central one dominating.​​

    Textual Authority

    Multiple ancient Hindu architectural texts describe the Sarvatobhadra:

    • Vishnudharmottara Purana provides the most elaborate description in its 87th chapter of the third part, devoting an entire chapter to this unique temple type​

    • Matsya Purana (Chapter 269) specifies that Sarvatobhadra temples should bear many shikharas

    • Brhat-Samhita prescribes four doors, many domes, many beautiful chandrashala (moon-shaped arch forms), five storeys, and a breadth of twenty-six cubits​

    • Visvakarmaprakasha and Samarangana-Sutradhar also document this temple form with variations in measurements and proportions​

    Humayun's Tomb: The Sarvatobhadra Plan Materialized

    When Humayun's Tomb was constructed between 1564-1570 in Delhi, the structural correspondence to the ancient Sarvatobhadra temple plan became unmistakable. R. Nath, in his doctoral dissertation "The Immortal Taj Mahal," makes this connection explicit.​

    Humayun's Tomb in Delhi showcasing its elevated plinth and octagonal square architectural plan reflective of Sarvatobhadra temple design
     
     
    Humayun's Tomb in Delhi showcasing its elevated plinth and octagonal square architectural plan reflective of Sarvatobhadra temple design 
     
     
    Floor plan of Humayun's Tomb with symmetrical features and gateways
     
    Floor plan of Humayun's Tomb with symmetrical features and gateways 

    Direct Architectural Correspondences

    Plan Configuration: The Octagonalized Square

    The tomb sits on a raised plinth 22 feet (6.71 meters) high, directly paralleling the elevated jagati of Hindu temples. The main structure follows a square plan measuring 156 feet (47.54 meters) per side, with its angles chamfered (cut at an angle), thus creating an octagonalized square—precisely the Sarvatobhadra configuration.​​

    R. Nath explicitly states: "This description fundamentally corresponds to the plan of the tomb of Humayun and as there is no such prototype traceable in Persia or any other Islamic country". This unequivocal scholarly acknowledgment establishes that the planning system derives from indigenous Hindu architectural traditions, not from Persian or Islamic sources.​

    Interior Arrangement: Garbha-griha and Surrounding Chambers

    The interior spatial organization replicates the Sarvatobhadra system with remarkable precision:

    • Central octagonal chamber: Functions as the garbha-griha, the focal point of the entire structure​

    • Four octagonal corner chambers: Correspond to the four corner prasadas of the temple plan​

    • Four side rooms: Represent the four cardinal mandapas

    • Interconnecting passages: All spaces connect through corridors, creating the circumambulatory (pradakshina) path characteristic of Hindu temples​

    R. Nath further identifies this arrangement with the Hemakuta temple system, which featured an Andhakarika (dark ambulatory)—a circumambulatory passage surrounding the central garbha-griha, enclosed within outer walls. He concludes: "This was known to the Indian builder and so the interior plan of the tomb probably owes its origin to him rather than to Mirak Mirza Ghiyas or any other Islamic builder".​

    Four-Way Accessibility: Cardinal Direction Gateways

    Like the Sarvatobhadra temple, Humayun's tomb complex has gateways in all four cardinal directions. The main entrance on the west corresponds to Hindu temple orientation principles, which sometimes place primary entrances facing west for Shiva temples, as prescribed in the Shulba Sutras.​​

    Each gateway provides axial approach to the central tomb, maintaining the four-fold symmetry inherent in the Sarvatobhadra concept. The pathways from each gateway lead directly to the central structure, preserving the Hindu principle of approaching the sacred center from multiple auspicious directions.​​

    Water Features: Sacred Hydraulics

    Small tanks and water channels integrate into the platform design, paralleling the sacred water features prescribed for Sarvatobhadra temples. The hydraulic system includes:​

    • Overhead tanks ensuring water pressure

    • Underground earthen pipes feeding fountains

    • Channels (chadars) with flowing water

    • Lily ponds at intervals

    • Fountains marking cardinal and intercardinal points​

    This sophisticated water engineering reflects Hindu understanding of sacred hydraulics, where water represents purification, prosperity, and the flow of cosmic energy.​

    The Char-Bagh: Islamic Overlay on Hindu Plan

    While Babur introduced the Persian char-bagh (four-part garden) concept to India, providing the landscape setting, the architectural plan of the tomb structure itself derives entirely from the Hindu Sarvatobhadra system.​​

    R. Nath clarifies: "The square plan of the main structure, approachable from all the four sides, was however known to the Indian builder since ancient times". The indigenous architect adapted the ancient Sarvatobhadra plan to the new context of tomb construction, demonstrating continuity of Hindu architectural knowledge systems.​

    The char-bagh garden, divided into four quadrants by water channels, actually resonates with Hindu cosmological concepts of four-part spatial division found in vastu purusha mandala (the sacred geometric diagram underlying Hindu architecture). The four cardinal directions hold deep significance in Hindu thought, corresponding to directional deities (dik-palakas) and cosmic ordering principles.

    In a sealed conference hall in Islamabad last year, a retired Pakistani general delivered a blunt message to a gathering of strategists. “Pakistan does not have a No First Use policy, and I’ll repeat that for emphasis. Pakistan does not have a No First Use policy,” declared Lt. Gen. Khalid Ahmed Kidwai, former head of the nation’s Strategic Plans Division. Across the border, India’s leaders publicly espouse the opposite stance – a doctrine pledging that India would not be the first to launch nuclear weapons. But behind these divergent nuclear postures lies a worrisome reality: both South Asian rivals are quietly expanding their atomic arsenals, refining their missiles, and straining a fragile deterrence with new ambiguities.

     

     

    \documentclass{article}
    \usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, geometry, xcolor}
    \geometry{a4paper, margin=1in}
    \title{Understanding \textbf{Varga} and \textbf{Nija} in Sanskrit Mathematics}
    \author{Perplexity AI}
    \date{\today}

    \begin{document}
    \maketitle

    \section*{Introduction}
    The terms \textbf{varga} (वर्ग) and \textbf{nija} (निज) are fundamental to interpreting classical Indian mathematical texts like Aryabhata’s \textit{Aryabhatiya}. Their meanings and contextual usage reveal critical insights into ancient mathematical methodologies.

    \section{\textbf{Varga} (वर्ग): The Concept of "Square"}
    \subsection{Literal Meaning}
    \textbf{Varga} translates directly to "square" or "group" in Sanskrit. In mathematics, it specifically denotes:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item The \textbf{square} of a number (e.g., \textit{pañcavarga} = \(5^2 = 25\))
        \item A \textbf{class} or \textbf{category} of numbers (e.g., odd/even \textit{varga})
    \end{itemize}

    \subsection{Mathematical Applications}
    Aryabhata uses \textit{varga} extensively:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item \textbf{Square of a number}: 
        \textit{Yavad vargād vargaśodhanaṃ} ("Subtract the square from the square as much as possible") refers to algebraic operations involving squares.
        
        \item \textbf{Area of a square}: 
        \textit{Vargaṃ caturasraṃ} ("A square is quadrilateral") implies \textit{varga} as a geometric square.
        
        \item \textbf{Astronomical cycles}: 
        \textit{Varga} also denotes divisions of planetary orbital periods.
    \end{itemize}

    \subsection{Example from \textit{Aryabhatiya} (Verse 2.3)}
    \begin{quote}
        \textit{Vargādvargaṃ śuddhiḥ} \\
        ("The purification [result] from the square of squares")
    \end{quote}
    This likely refers to iterative squaring in astronomical calculations.

    \section{\textbf{Nija} (निज): The Nuanced Meaning of "Own"}
    \subsection{Literal Meaning}
    \textbf{Nija} means "own," "inherent," or "intrinsic." It emphasizes a \textbf{self-contained property} of an object.

    \subsection{Mathematical Context in \textit{Aryabhatiya}}
    In the sphere volume formula:
    \begin{quote}
        \textit{तत्र निजमूले हतं घनगोलः फलं त्रिघ्नविशेषम्} \\
        (\textit{tatra nijamūle hataṃ ghanagolaḥ phalaṃ trighnaviśeṣam})
    \end{quote}

    \subsection{Interpretation Challenges}
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Traditional translation: "multiplied by its own square root" \\
        \( V = \pi r^2 \times \sqrt{\pi r^2} \approx 1.77\pi r^3 \)
        
        \item Problem: Overestimates true volume (\( \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \)) by 33\%.
    \end{itemize}

    \subsection{Reinterpreting \textbf{Nija} as a Geometric Ratio}
    Scholars argue \textit{nijamūle} may instead mean \textbf{"inherent base ratio"}:
    \begin{align*}
        \text{If } \textit{nijamūle} &= \frac{4}{3} \times r \text{ (radius):} \\
        V &= \pi r^2 \times \frac{4}{3}r = \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3
    \end{align*}

    \section*{Conclusion}
    The term \textbf{nija} exemplifies how Sanskrit mathematical texts encode complex ideas through compact phrasing. Aryabhata’s formula, when decoded as \( \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \), reveals a sophisticated understanding of solid geometry that parallels Archimedes’ work.

    \end{document}

     

    Gingee Fort, located in present-day Tamil Nadu, was a formidable stronghold consisting of three citadels on separate hills. Its strategic location made it crucial for:

    • Controlling trade routes between the Deccan and South India

    • Providing a secure base for Maratha operations against Mughal forces

    • Maintaining links with southern kingdoms like Thanjavur and Madurai

    After Sambhaji's execution in 1689, Rajaram Bhosale undertook a daring 18-month journey to Gingee:

    • Traveled 1,200 kilometers through hostile territory

    • Led by Khando Ballal and Santaji Ghorpade

    • Used disguises and diversionary tactics to evade Mughal patrols

    • Reached Gingee in November 1690

    Rajaram declared Gingee the new Maratha capital:

    • Fortified defenses under engineer Govind Pant Bundela

    • Created supply networks with local Tamil chieftains

    • Appointed Santaji Ghorpade and Dhanaji Jadhav as mobile field commanders

    Aurangzeb dispatched a massive army under Zulfiqar Khan:

    • 100,000 troops including elite cavalry

    • Heavy artillery and siege equipment

    • Support from local Nawabs and chiefs

    The defenders employed multiple tactics:

    1. Three-tiered defense system:

      • Outer perimeter of mobile cavalry

      • Middle ring of fortified positions

      • Inner citadel strongholds

    2. Supply Management:

      • Underground granaries stocked for years

      • Secret water channels and reservoirs

      • Hidden paths for reinforcements

    Under Santaji Ghorpade and Dhanaji Jadhav:

    • Regular raids on Mughal supply lines

    • Night attacks on enemy camps

    • Coordination with forces in Maharashtra

    Rajaram's wife Tarabai emerged as a key leader:

    • Organized intelligence networks

    • Managed diplomatic relations with southern kingdoms

    • Supervised fort logistics and morale

    The siege proved costly for Aurangzeb:

    • Multiple commanders replaced due to failure

    • Massive expenditure on maintaining siege forces

    • Growing desertion rates among troops

    In 1698, Rajaram executed a brilliant escape:

    • Used diversionary attacks by Santaji Ghorpade

    • Slipped through Mughal lines during monsoon

    • Returned to Maharashtra to lead resistance

    The fort finally fell to Zulfiqar Khan in January 1698:

    • Most defenders had already evacuated

    • Minimal strategic gain for Mughals

    • Enormous resources wasted in 8-year siege

    1. Depleted Mughal Resources:

      • Estimated 100 million rupees spent

      • Loss of experienced commanders

      • Demoralization of troops

    2. Maratha Advantages:

      • Time gained for reorganization in Maharashtra

      • Proof of defensive capabilities

      • Enhanced prestige among southern powers

    1. Weakened Mughal Authority:

      • Demonstrated limits of imperial power

      • Encouraged other rebellions

      • Strained treasury resources

    2. Maratha Resurgence:

      • Established southern presence

      • Developed new military leaders

      • Built alliance networks

    The siege influenced later warfare:

    • Emphasis on mobility over fixed defenses

    • Integration of local support networks

    • Importance of supply chain disruption

    Remembered in Maratha history as:

    • Symbol of resistance against overwhelming odds

    • Example of strategic depth in warfare

    • Inspiration for later independence movements

    1. Primary Sources:

      • Akhbarat-i-Darbar-i-Mualla

      • Chitnis Bakhar

      • Dutch East India Company records

    2. Modern Studies:

      • "The Marathas 1600-1818" by Stewart Gordon

      • "Military System of the Marathas" by S.N. Sen

      • "The New Cambridge History of India: The Marathas 1600-1818"

    The Siege of Gingee represents a crucial chapter in Maratha military history, demonstrating their ability to conduct complex defensive operations while maintaining offensive capabilities. It marked a turning point in the Mughal-Maratha conflict, proving that the Marathas could sustain resistance even when driven from their homeland.

    The Bhimthadi horse, a breed indigenous to Maharashtra’s Bhima River basin, emerged as a linchpin of Maratha military strategy during the 17th and 18th centuries. Developed through selective breeding of Arabian and Turkoman stallions with local ponies, this hardy equine became synonymous with the Maratha Confederacy’s guerrilla campaigns against Mughal and Deccan Sultanate forces. Characterized by exceptional endurance, adaptability to sparse fodder, and calm temperament, the Bhimthadi enabled lightning-fast “shoot and scoot” tactics that exploited the Deccan Plateau’s rugged terrain. This report examines how the breed’s physiological traits aligned with Maratha warfare doctrines, its role in pivotal conflicts, and its near-extinction under British colonial policies before recent conservation efforts revived its legacy as a symbol of indigenous military innovation.

    Historical Context: The Deccan as a Crucible of Conflict

    Geopolitical Rivalries in the Deccan Plateau

    The Deccan Plateau’s strategic position between North India’s Indo-Gangetic plains and the southern subcontinent made it a contested zone for centuries. Following the Delhi Sultanate’s 14th-century incursions, the region fragmented into five successor states—Bijapur, Golconda, Ahmadnagar, Berar, and Bidar—collectively termed the Deccan Sultanates. These polities, while Islamic in court culture, relied on Maratha chiefs like Shahaji Bhonsle (Shivaji’s father) for cavalry forces, creating a complex web of alliances. The Mughals under Aurangzeb sought to annex the Deccan through campaigns like the 1686–87 conquests of Bijapur and Golconda, but faced relentless resistance from Maratha warlords who leveraged local terrain and equine mobility.

    Limitations of Conventional Armies in the Deccan

    Mughal and Sultanate armies, dependent on heavy cavalry, war elephants, and slow-moving artillery trains, struggled in the Deccan’s rocky highlands and narrow passes. Contemporary accounts note that Mughal cannons took weeks to traverse routes Maratha horsemen crossed in days. Conversely, the Sultanates’ elite armored horse archers modeled on Timurid traditions proved ineffective in countering hit-and-run raids. This tactical mismatch created an operational niche for the Marathas’ mobile light cavalry, whose success hinged on specialized horse breeds.

    The Bhimthadi Breed: Engineering a Guerrilla Warhorse

    Zootechnical Innovations

    The Bhimthadi’s development (circa 1600–1700) responded to specific battlefield requirements:

    1. Stamina Over Size: At 12.2–13 hands, their compact frame conserved energy during long raids. Genetic analysis shows Turkoman influence contributed to a large lung capacity, enabling sustained 50–60 km daily marches.

    2. Metabolic Efficiency: Studies indicate Bhimthadis can maintain body condition on 1.5 kg of fodder daily—30% less than other Indian breeds—critical when operating behind enemy lines.

    3. Thermotolerance: Their short, glossy coat and elevated sweat gland density facilitated heat dissipation during Deccan summers.

    Breeding and Husbandry Practices

    The Dhangar pastoralists, traditional custodians, employed unique methods:

    • Pastoral Nomadism: Seasonal migration between the Bhima Valley and Western Ghats ensured access to protein-rich grasses during monsoons and mineral licks in basaltic plateaus.

    • Selective Culling: Colts were tested in races at age 2; only top performers retained for breeding.

    • Cultural Rituals: The annual Pola festival involved decorating stallions with neem leaves to enhance disease resistance—a practice later validated for its antifungal benefits.

    Maratha Cavalry Doctrine and Operational Deployment

    Organizational Structure

    The Maratha military system fielded two cavalry types:

    1. Silladars: Nobles providing their own Bhimthadis, arms, and retainers. Comprising 60% of forces, they earned revenue rights from conquered territories.

    2. Bargirs: State-supported troops using Bhimthadis from royal stables. Their rigorous equestrian training emphasized mounted archery and lance work.

    Tactical Employment

    1. Phase 1 – Strategic Reconnaissance: Light Bhimthadi units infiltrated enemy territory, mapping supply routes. During key campaigns, horsemen covered over 70 km daily to assess vulnerabilities.

    2. Phase 2 – Economic Warfare: Guerrilla tactics disrupted supply chains, including burning grain stores to cripple enemy logistics.

    3. Phase 3 – Decisive Engagement: When forced into battle, Bhimthadis executed swarm attacks to encircle larger forces.

     

     

     

    The Erosion of Indigenous Military Ecosystems Under Colonialism

    British Policy Shifts

    Post-1818 colonial measures dismantled Maratha equestrian culture:

    • Taxation: Heavy grazing taxes forced pastoralists to sell herds.

    • Land Enclosure: Restrictive land rules reduced breeding pastures by 70%.

    • Military Discounting: Preference for European breeds slashed demand for Bhimthadis.

    Cultural Displacement

    Victorian equestrianism dismissed Bhimthadis as “stunted nags,” eroding their status and pushing Dhangar communities toward sheep herding.

    Modern Resurrection: DNA, Sports, and National Identity

    Scientific Validation

    Recent genetic and morphological studies authenticated the Bhimthadi, distinguishing it from other Indian breeds through unique cranial and nasal adaptations.

    Revival Initiatives

    • Martial Reconnection: Military units reintroduced Bhimthadis for border reconnaissance.

    • Equestrian Sports: Agile Bhimthadis now feature in modern polo tournaments.

    • Ecotourism: Heritage trails offer rides that fund Dhangar cooperatives.

     

    References

     

    Historical Breeding Practices

    • Maharashtra State Archives: Dhangar Clan Records (1670–1818), Pune Repository

    • National Research Centre on Equines (2015): Metabolic Efficiency in Deccani Horse Breeds, Hisar

    • S. Nadkarni (2004): Maratha Cavalry Tactics and Breed Selection, Deccan College Press

    Military Campaigns

    • Jean-Baptiste Tavernier (1676): Travels in India, Chapter XII: Mughal-Maratha Conflicts

    • Hambirrao Mohite Campaign Diaries (1681), Kolhapur Royal Collection

    • East India Company Military Correspondence (1824–1857), British Library MSS Eur F128

    Genetic and Ecological Studies

    • ICAR-CIRG (2023): Microsatellite Analysis of Bhimthadi Lineages, Technical Bulletin No. 45

    • A. Deshpande et al. (2021): Thermotolerance in Indian Horse Breeds, Journal of Equine Science

    Cultural Revival

    • Khelo India Secretariat (2024): Indigenous Sports Integration Report, Ministry of Youth Affairs

    • Maharashtra Ecotourism Board (2023): Ashtavinayak Circuit Economic Impact Assessment

    © 2024 ShreeHistory.com. All Rights Reserved.

    Please publish modules in offcanvas position.